freethehumblefarmer@localnet.com

THE RIVER IS WIDE
 Protecting the Public in Public Radio

Speaking Truth to Power
Stirring the Public Conscience


The river is wide where many of us live here in Maine.
Today,  we lend a hand to speak truth to power and share the story of a once great radio station nearly lost to small-minded censorship and a  disregard for freedom of speech, a disregard for the right of citizens in a democracy to be reminded to Vote in election season, a disregard for the lessons of the past that great atrocities are committed by those who hide behind "laws" and rules that are unjust, that forcing employees to sign guidelines  that suppress their right to express social views is oppression of the worst kind. We first began to fear the loss of MPBN radio with the stifling and firing of "The humble Farmer", Robert Skoglund.  We first began to fear that MPBN was ignoring the public when the cries of those who could only give small  30  dollar donations were met with indifference to the honest request that 'humble'  be returned to the air. We knew then that listeners like the author of our "Rant for all Time", a timeless rant presented below, were forgotten.  These are the very same listeners whose preferences have been ignored.
+++

HOW DO YOU SPELL CIVIC RESPONSIBILITY IN WORDS
TRANSMITTABLE  TO
MAINE PUBLIC BROADCASTING?
ENACTED
ON APRIL 16, 2009
LD 266 as amended

Amend the bill by striking out everything after the enacting clause and before the summary and inserting the following:

‘Sec. 1. 20-A MRSA §852, sub-§3,  as enacted by PL 1991, c. 848, §2, is amended to read:

3. Transfer of assets and liabilities.   The University of Maine System may transfer any assets and liabilities acquired pursuant to this section in order to unify operation in a nonprofit, nonstock private corporation., referred to in this section as "the corporation." The University of Maine System retains a reversionary interest in the university's assets as provided for in the articles of incorporation of that corporation. An annual appropriation for operating, constructing, equipping, maintaining, improving and replacing facilities of the corporation must be made in amounts sufficient to ensure delivery of broadcast sources throughout the State.

Sec. 2. 20-A MRSA §852, sub-§4  is enacted to read:

4Condition of funding.   As a condition of receiving an appropriation or allocation of state funds to broadcast throughout the State, the corporation shall continue to operate, equip and maintain facilities used to provide signals identified under paragraphs A and B that were in operation on February 1, 2009 or an equivalent network providing equivalent or expanded broadcast coverage throughout the State:

AA television broadcast signal originating from stations whose community of license is Presque Isle, Calais, Orono, Augusta and Biddeford; and

BA radio broadcast signal originating from stations whose community of license is Fort Kent, Presque Isle, Calais, Bangor, Waterville, Camden and Portland.

Sec. 3. 20-A MRSA §852, sub-§5  is enacted to read:

5Failure to meet funding conditions.   If the corporation fails to meet the requirements of subsection 4 during any state fiscal year in which an appropriation or allocation has been made, the corporation shall return the full amount of that appropriation or allocation to the Treasurer of State within 15 business days of the beginning of the next state fiscal year.

Sec. 4. 20-A MRSA §852, sub-§6  is enacted to read:

6Exceptions.   The corporation does not fail to meet the requirements of subsection 4 if:

AOne or more of the broadcast signals described in subsection 4, paragraphs A and B is off the air for a period of time due to a reason outside of the control of the corporation; or

BAll of the television broadcast signals or all of the radio broadcast signals are off the air for an equal period of time for any reason.

SUMMARY

This amendment eliminates the use of the terms "towers" and "transmitters." It specifies that facilities used to provide signals must be maintained to provide broadcast coverage that equals or exceeds the coverage in place on February 1, 2009. It specifies that the corporation operating the statewide public broadcasting network has not failed to meet the broadcast requirements if the reason for a signal being off the air is outside the control of the corporation or if all signals in the network are off the air for an equal period of time.FISCAL NOTE REQUIRED

(See attached)

WHICH WILL ENSURE THAT PUBLIC BROADCASTING MUST BE MAINTAINED STATE-WIDE IF MPBN IS TO RECEIVE 2.25 MILLION DOLLARS IN STATE FUNDING.
( SEE www.maine.gov/legislature)
SO FOR NOW, THE PUBLIC
IN PUBLIC B
ROADCASTING
IS PROTECTED.
FOR NOW.
+++
"THE COMMONPLACE IS THE THING, BUT IT'S HARD TO FIND.
THEN IF YOU BELIEVE IN IT,

HAVE A LOVE FOR IT, THIS SPECIFIC THING

WILL BECOME A UNIVERSAL."


-ANDREW WYETH
JULY 12, 1917- JANUARY 16, 2009


                                                                        
+++
"...And to all those who have wondered
if America's beacon still burns as bright:
Tonight we proved once more that
the true strength of our nation
comes not from the might of our arms
 or the scale of our wealth, but from the enduring
 power of our ideals:
democracy, liberty, opportunity and unyielding hope.
That's the true genius of America:
that America can change. Our union can be perfected.
What we've already achieved gives us hope
for what we can and must achieve tomorrow. "

- President of the United States
Barack Obama

in his victory speech on
November 4, 2008



+++
freethehumblefarmer.com
asks:
I
S THIS MPBN’S FINAL ANTLER ?

From www.Answers.com/topic/MPBN

Controversy

In 2000 and 2001, in an effort to increase listenership and make the station more attractive to underwriters, Maine Public Radio, under the leadership of Vice-President for Radio Services, Charles Beck, made a number of changes in staff and programming. In the course of 24 months, longtime classical music hosts Victor Hathaway, Virgil Bissett, Helen York and Dave Bunker left the station. The live broadcast of the Metropolitan Opera on saturday afternoons which had been a mainstay of classical music broadcasting for more than twenty years was discontinued. Despite Maine Public Broadcasting's claims that the opera was being dropped due to lack of popularity among listeners, a citizens' protest forced the network to reinstate the Saturday afternoon opera after a few months.

In January 2005, Maine Public Broadcasting joined a few other PBS stations in showing the controversial "Sugartime!" episode of Postcards from Buster.

In 2006 and 2007 Maine humorist and veteran jazz host Robert Skoglund, a.k.a. The humble Farmer, aired controversial humorous comments pointed at current government leaders and at the Republican administration under President George W. Bush. Charles Beck formally reprimanded the ever loquacious Skoglund in a letter threatening to remove him from the airwaves if he did not curb his remarks. In response to this censorship, Skoglund went silent - limiting his vocal utterances during the program to one or two word identifications of songs or musicians. Listeners accustomed to The humble Farmer's rambling anecdotes have been protesting in letters to the station and to newspapers across the state. According to news sources the MPBN Board of Trustees will take up the matter in a special meeting in April 2007. Sources: Bangor Daily News article by Tom Groening, March 16, 2007 http://www.bangordailynews.com/news/t/news.aspx?articleid=147541&zoneid=164

A copy of Beck's letter to Skoglund can be found at NCAC: http://ncac.org/entertainment/20070312~ME-Belfast~Defend_Free_

+++
LIKE A FINE CIGAR, A GOOD RANT NEVER LOSES ITS EDGE.
SO,  WE  RE-VISIT
MEMORABLE RANTS FROM THE PAST !
+++

Dear Mr. Harper,

We thought you would be interested to know that Maine Public

Broadcasting Network has been invoking your code of ethics for

journalists to give credence to the network’s suppression of freedom

of speech.

As former journalists who believe in the precepts of the Society of

Professional Journalists and who adhered to the code of ethics during

our journalistic careers, we find it reprehensible that MPBN is

invoking the good name of your organization in its efforts to silence

one of its humorists/commentators, Robert Skoglund.

Apparently, Skoglund—who performs under the name of the humble Farmer—

made a comment on his Friday night radio show that offended the

powers-who-be at MPBN. They required him to sign the station’s "on-

air standards and legal guidelines," which bar him from making

political comments on his show. The guidelines include the following:

• On-air personnel should not make religious or political calls

to action, editorialize, include content or showcase views and

opinions on sensitive or controversial issues.

• On-air personnel are not allowed to air personal grievances on

MPBN services. This includes introducing content that endorses,

compares or criticizes commercial products, institutions, companies,

organizations, or individuals. In addition, on-air personnel should

not dedicate programming or musical selections without prior

knowledge of and approval from management.

While such standards should certainly apply to journalists who are

reporting the news, it should not prevent commentators/humorists from

expressing a point of view. That would be like barring Jay Leno from

telling jokes about George W. Bush.

Skoglund, who on most programs talks about his wife, "the almost

perfect woman," and life as an old-time Mainer, is a humorist, not a

news reporter. His show is a mix of Maine humor and jazz; his wry

comments are often funny, sometimes thought-provoking, even bizarre

at times—certainly nothing that merits censorship. Unfortunately,

when Skoglund refused to adhere to the station’s demands that he sign

the guidelines, MPBN took the program, which has aired for years, off

the air. We as listeners complained about the action. In response,

MPBN invoked your organization’s code of ethics, stating that the

station "strictly adhere[s] to the Society of Professional

Journalists Code of Ethics." The station’s response, by the way, was

signed only "MPBN Audience Services," with no personal signature.

First, we do not believe that the SPJ code has anything to do with

MPBN’s censorship of Skoglund. Secondly, we believe that MPBN itself

is violating the code, in particular the following tenets:

• Tell the story of the diversity and magnitude of the human

experience boldly, even when it is unpopular to do so.

• Support the open exchange of views, even views they find

repugnant. Be vigilant and courageous about holding those with power

accountable.

• Deny favored treatment to advertisers and special interests and

resist their pressure to influence news coverage.

• Abide by the same high standards to which they hold others.

Such strong-armed tactics to silence points of view that may not

coincide with the mainstream corporate line jeopardize free speech

and are particularly disturbing when employed by a publicly financed

organization like MPBN that espouses support for freedom of speech.

We urge your organization, as a well respected bulwark against such

tactics, to speak out on this issue.

Thank you.

Best regards,

S and J *

+++
 sent to my State Senator and Representative.

Once a complete loyal listener to MPBN, the attitude of their management has alienated many of us. For me two straws were in regard to the Humble Farmer dismissal which I voiced my opinion on inside the Channel 10 hearing room.

Certain persons at MPBN have over the years have whittled on Humble's very long standing program, that I was from time to time part of, in my now 30 years in Maine. Cutting a well liked opening theme? Putting him in a dead spot in the lineup? Then the retro-active loyalty pledge to eliminate all but his music? Funny how this firing happened based on not going along with Mr. *****'s program, just after Humble's request for a few dollars to offset this retired gentleman's expenses!

Now because MPBN has a cash flow issue caused by the economy and their without merit dismissal of Humble, they want to shut down lifelines to less populated broadcast zones?

I love my Public Radio programs, but I ethically can not support them at the cost of the dignity of those who still work there who must live under the cloud of Humble's outrageous dismissal!

MPBN expanded with the help of its listeners who have given and sacrificed to support THEIR stations. They should not be put out or endangered because of poor or prejudicial judgements of one man who has influenced the board in these catastrophic directions.

If ** stays, I stay away! If ** goes, I will return! Until then I will oppose any state or federal bill to put more change in *** pocket, unless that is change from unemployment compensation.

Sincerely,
L. W. M.
+++
To The humble Farmer: 
"I do need to address another issue with you, again. I am disappointed to have to do this again. You're a very smart guy; I'm not sure why we contiue to have this issue come up..."
Cha*l*s *eck
B**g*r, Main*
+++
Sent to MPBN today [June 2007].

Re: Censorship of the Humble Farmer

Intelligent citizens listen to both conservative and liberal voices with the same discerning ear.  Whether I’m listening to Bill O’Reilly, John Stewart or Angus King I’m looking for perspectives that shed light on issues of the day.  I don't care what time of day I get the message or if it comes during "entertainment." Still, I can be wrong, like dutifully supporting an invasion of Iraq while I’m being lied to by my government. 

The Humble Farmer is part of the American satirist tradition of dry humor and political commentary. Mark Twain, Will Rogers, Garrison Keillor, Stephen Colbert – should these satirists be censored? 

How disappointing to watch MPBN bow to the latest conservative political fad and silence the Humble Farmer - a voice I've enjoyed for almost thirty years.

I guess I will continue to pay for cable and reconsider my donation to public radio. 
Are you going to report me?”
I heard their piece on Tuesday.  It p***d me off.
Keep the faith.
G I
Yarmouth, ME 04020

+++
'Humble Farmer' dropped from radio
[and Sixty Legislators Sign a Petition to Bring Him Back]
By Associated Press
June 16, 2007 6:00 AM

AUGUSTA, Maine — About 60 state legislators signed a petition Friday calling for the Maine Public Broadcasting Network to reinstate "The Humble Farmer," the radio personality it dropped from its lineup after more than 28 years on the air.

Robert Skogland, a humorist from St. George, was dropped by the network after he refused to sign a letter saying he would follow commentary guidelines that apply to all of MPBN's on-air staff outside of the news department, said Lou Morin, communications manager for MPBN.

The informal document signed by dozens of lawmakers and Secretary of State Matthew Dunlap, which does not carry the force of law, expresses admiration for Skoglund's "dry wit, clever repartee, droll observations (and) Down East enthusiasm," and regret that Skoglund was let go.

"We humbly petition the powers that be to bring the Humble Farmer back to us," says the petition, which appears on House of Representatives stationery.

Skoglund's final program, which was a mixture of old jazz tunes and Skoglund's humor and commentary, aired last Friday.

Skoglund declined to comment on the cancellation, saying only that he wanted his "life back."

Skoglund's departure ends an eight-month feud between him and MPBN's management over what he could say in his commentary pieces, which he labeled as "rants."

The dispute began in November, when MPBN wouldn't air a taped show that included Skoglund reading a letter that was critical of a spending cap in Maryland similar to referendum that was about to be voted on in Maine.

MPBN program managers said they didn't want Skoglund's show to be viewed as taking sides on political issues. They sent him a set of guidelines, which included a ban on taking stances on controversial issues.

Skoglund responded by sending in his taped show every week without commentary. But he continued to publish his "rants" on his Web site, and he said he received hundreds of e-mails from supporters.

In April, Skoglund and about 20 supporters attended an MPBN board meeting in Lewiston to protest the restrictions. Many supporters said that MPBN's guidelines are a form of censorship.

+++

Salmon, Crappies (pronounced crawpeese) AND Bottom-feeders: 
 HOW ARE THEY DOING?

As our Winter Fishing Updates end:
ARE  SALMON  FINDING  THEIR WAY
BACK TO THEIR OWN RIVERS
by memorizing (as registered river guides tell us)  the scent  and the taste of their own rivers?

 AND 
THE FIRST QUESTION IN OUR QUIZ:

S
o You Think You Know Fish
?
How many Salmon does it take to make a Crappie  equal to the biggest Crappie  (pronounced crawpee) in existence?

THE ANSWER?
WHY WASTE A GOOD SALMON ?

++++

Y
our sixth reading is here for
our summer Home Study Course
The Quality of Money:
Can My Thirty  Dollars be better quality than Your 2.25 million?
How about 2.25 million dollars in commissions  earned by a Mortgage broker selling sub-prime mortgages to families who couldn't afford them but were
just pursuing the American Dream of home ownership
VS.
30 dollars earned selling rhubarb?
See ?


Gross National Happiness is far more important than Gross National Product.”
- HM Jigme Singme Wangchuck 
- King of Bhutan where "happily and spontaneously, the Golden Fish (semga) swim unobstructed through murky waters. They symbolize humankind’s ability to take correct actions in a challenging world.”

-

Freethehumblefarmer@localnet.com
B***, ME 04***
June 14, 2007

Governor John Baldacci
State House Station # 1
Augusta, Maine Dear
Cc: Congressman Tom Allen. Congressman Mike Michaud, Attorney General Steven Rowe, Senate President Beth Edmonds and Speaker of the House Glenn Cummings

Dear Governor Baldacci:

In light of the extraordinary disregard by the Maine Public Broadcasting Network of citizens’ freedom of expression, over 100 Maine taxpayers have joined together to ask that you immediately introduce legislation to the current session of the Maine Legislature to suspend all Maine government funding to the Maine Public Broadcasting Network
Chief Executive Officer James Dowe has fired Robert Skoglund, The humble Farmer. This action is an arrogant abandonment and neglect of cherished freedoms: the right to free speech and the right to free expression. The State of Maine should not provide funds for organizations that do not honor fundamental civil liberties, including the right to free speech. We further ask that this suspension be in place until the Maine Public Broadcasting Network management rescinds the politically motivated censorship imposed on Robert Skoglund, The humble Farmer and other MPBN creative talent through the station’s demand that performers sign guidelines restricting statements about  a wide range of topics, including those considered political or controversial.  Congressman Tom Allen, Congressman Mike Michaud, Attorney General Steven Rowe, Speaker of the Maine House Glenn Cummings and President of the Maine Senate Beth Edmonds have also received copies  of this letter. Please acknowledge and respect the wishes of Maine people who collectively and individually support this request for suspension of support for MPBN.
Thank you.
Sincerely,

S*s*n C*o*
*** ********** St.
B*** ME 04****

And over 100 others who from 4:00pm on June 13th, 2007  to12 noon on June 14th, 2007  emailed   Freethehumblefarmer@localnet.com and  said “Please add my name to this letter.”


On June 12, 2007, our buddy ‘humble’, Robert Skoglund got a call from the President  and CEO of Maine Public Broadcasting, Jim Dowe, telling him that he was fired, that his program “The humble Farmer”, after 30 years would no longer be aired on MPBN on Friday nights. Humble, in an act of extraordinary personal courage refused to sign a detailed list of guidelines, written up a lawyer, that forbid him to speak about anything political or controversial.  What ‘humble’ had said, that was ‘political’  was, in fact, about things that troubled his  ‘conscience’:
a remembrance of the Holocast, refusing to accept invasions of privacy by the government, questioning tax policy.
Between 4:00pm on Wednesday June 13 to noon on Thursday June 14, well over 100 of you in your own act of personal courage  immediately signed on to  this  letter  to our Governor, our congressmen, the President of the Maine Senate, the Speaker of the House, and the Attorney General, condemning  the  abandonment of the right to freedom of expression and freedom of speech that these guidelines presented and asking that all funding to MPBN be suspended until the guidelines were removed for Robert Skoglund and for all MPBN employees.
What followed is  a year of activism: hundreds (about $160,000 worth) refusing to give MPBN money,  a call that people go to the Federal Communications Commission hearing, in Portland,  letters published in newspapers, a cartoon in the Portland Press Herald, creation of a website, www.freethehumblefarmer.com to share the story and the hundreds of letters that humble received from his saddened listeners, attendance at  a hearing at the legislature  supporting a bill to explore ways to oversee MPBN’s huge  2.25 million dollars allotment from Maine State government, letters to  other Public Radio ‘stars’, letters to legislators, every member of the Education and Cultural Services Services Committee and the Appropriations Committee telling them not to fund  MPBN’s  practice of  censorship,  articles on the website about the Ukrainian Holomodar- a genocide- like the Holocast- this one in the 1930’s, carried out by the Soviets through a manufactured famine that relied on censorship by the government to keep it a secret and in place. We formed another email address poetsfreehumble@localnet.com, hoping that poets would write to Garrison Keillor, who is an easy mark for poets,  to help stop MPBN’s censorship.  We put out a call  to you all to enter the Prairie Home Companion Sonnet Contest. Many of you sent in sonnets about the loss of humble . No, none of us won the Sleep-number bed or the 3 dozen roses.  All of you, with great personal courage, at the risk of being discredited in any way possible,  by the  MPBN Board of Trustees and management
(read what they wrote to current.org if you think that’s not true)  have done something. Sixty legislators signed a petition, including our Secretary of State, Matt Dunlop,  asking ‘humbly’ that MPBN return ‘humble’ to the air. We got one letter from Governor Baldacci We got one encouraging phone call from his representative to the MPBN Board of Trustees,  Mark Lawrence, who said “This is a  fight worth fighting. “

MPBN is a monopoly in the state of Maine. We only have one public broadcasting network that programs all of public radio for our state.  That level of control over our media means many will silence themselves   before they risk  annoying and being spoken of badly (or just ignored) by the publicly funded- Power known as MPBN. 

Despite every effort to enlist legislative leaders to step up and act on  MPBN’s politically motivated censorship  by making a strong, hard statement that our tax dollars should not support censorship, few responded.  The Chair of the Education Committee tried to silence any testimony about the bill asking for accountability for MPBN. “I’m going to stop your right there,” he said.  Didn’t work, but he tried.

One person who understood very well why localism in media is important and spoke up- early and fast- at the Federal Communications Commission hearing in June 2007 in Portland-  is now running to represent  Maine in  the First Congressional District. Chellie Pingree knew (and probably still knows)  that the media holds the power to demean every cherished freedom   in our democracy. 

So, one year later,  MPBN has not returned ‘humble’ to the airwaves, which we all still want. But he did not lie down : instead he is better, stronger, funnier, drier, wittier than ever.  And all of us, invisible anonymous people,  sustained, just like we were last year, by the daily bread of our lives,  the  good times and the not-so-good ones,  should take heart in knowing that what we signed onto a year ago today was true then, is true now, and will always be true.  So, there is always more to say, but here is just one more thought. There is always  something  in you that the most powerful  people  in the world can not take away. But it is always worth protecting, just in case.


++++

F
ree the humble Farmer.com is honored to announce the establishment of the Annual Pony award. This award will be given annually to the individual or organization whose activities have worked to protect the public in public radio, by speaking truth to power, while stirring the public conscience.

Our annual Pony award is given to continue the work started here at Free the humble Farmer.com in the wake of our astonishment at the firing of Robert Skoglund, the 30 year host of a jazz  radio program, dear to many, many Mainers. Our work has been to hold Public Radio accountable to a  public commitment to  honor speech that is free, to present provocative new- and old-  ideas- and recognize  and protect imaginative approaches to social commentary that animate and call upon a broad array of human sensibilities.

It was not all the potentially compostable material surrounding MPBN’s firing of Mr. Skoglund that brought to mind the thought, “Hmm.. must be a pony here somewhere.”  No. Every farm is made better by a pony.

Public radio can be a magnificent pony, carrying little riders and big hefty ones,  even pulling wagons if need be and, most certainly, trying. But, not everyone knows how to ride a pony and a bad rider will ruin the most magnificent pony on earth. The most  well-funded pony in the world will be worth nothing.  The Pony Award is given to urge others to hold public radio accountable, to strive for the best pony possible by insisting that only riders who have learned to honor such a free and beautiful creature deserve to mount.

So, please stay tuned. Our annual Pony award is coming  soon.
"" "" ""

How It Can Be
Mr. Blomefield, the Vicar, had a large family of boys and girls; sometimes they used to come and play with Jessie and Flora...When they came, there was plenty of work for Merrylegs, for nothing pleased them so much as getting on him by turns and riding him all about the orchard and the home paddock, and this they would do by the hour.
One afternoon, he had been out with them for a long time, and when James brought him in and put on his halter, he said:
"There you rogue, mind how you behave yourslf, or we shall get into trouble."
"What have you been doing, Merrylegs?" I asked.
"Oh!" said he, tossing his little head, "I have only been giving those young people a lesson, they did not know when thery had had enough, nor when I had had enough, so I just pitched them off backwards, that was the only thing they could understand."
"What?" said I, "You threw the children off? I thought you did know better than that! Did you throw off Miss Jessie or Miss Flora?"
He looked very much offended, and said:
"Of course not. I would not do such a thing for the best oats that ever came into this stable; why I am as careful of our young ladies as the master could be, and as for the little ones, it is I who teach them to ride....I am the best friend and riding master those children can have."
"It is not them, it is the boys; boys," said he, shaking his mane, "are quite different; they must be broken in, as we are broken in when we were colts, and just be taught what's what. The other children had ridden me for nearly two hours, and then the boys thought it was their turn, and so it was, and I was quite agreeable. They rode me by turns, and I galloped them about up and down the fields and all about the orchard for a good hour.They had each cut a great hazel stickor a riding whip, and laid it on a little too hard; but I took it in good part, til at last I thought we had had enough, so I stopped two or three times by way of a hint.
Boys, you see, think a horse or a pony is like a steam engine or a threshing machine, and can go on as long and as fast as they please; they think a pony can get tired, or have any feelings; so as the one who was whipping me could not understand, I just rose up on my hind legs and let him slip off behind- that was all; he mounted me again and I did the same. Then the other boy got up, and as soon as he began to use his stick I laid him on the grass, and so on, till they were able to understand, that was all."


-from Black Beauty by  Anna Sewell
Also see:  Misty of Chincoteague by Marguerite Henry
Also see: The Secret Garden by Frances Hodgson Burnett


FYI:   Book Report
Title: Black Beauty
Author: Anna Sewell
Publishe: Grosset & Dunlap
Date: 1945

This book is the autobiography of a beautiful horse, Black Beauty.
    How can there live a horse who is obedient to all but only loved by those who understand him? How can such a faithful beast be not loved by all? There has lived no horse, to my knowledge, of this kind. Only in the imaginary world.  Anna Sewell has used such a horse in Black Beauty.
    Black Beauty was born a spiritful colt. He was sold at the age of four. This was when his life began.
    Beauty was told how horses had been torchered with work, whips, and death. He never thought he would witness such a life.
    As life went on he became a cab horse, sometimes being treated with kind words, sometimes with harsh words. Black Beauty’s life was almost ended during this job when he fell because the load he was carrying was too heavy. This brought Beauty to a beautiful home where he remained for the rest of his days.
    Black Beauty was a beautiful story and I enjoyed it thoroughly. Anna Sewell is a beautiful and expressive writer.
By Susan C,  Grade 6, Bartlett School
Cover B+  Composition A-  Writing A-
 
                                           
 Tough to find
a gifted Children's librarian when you need one, isn't it?


“On the shores of Chincoteague the people pressed forward, their faces strained to stiffness, as they watched Assateague Beach.

                “Here they come!” The cry broke out from every throat….

Suddenly, a fisherman, looking through binoculars, began shouting in a hoarse voice, “A new-borned colt is afeared to swim! It’s knee-deep in the water, and won’t go no further.”…”The colt’s too little to swim,” the fisherman bawled out. …”They’re half-ways across. Jumpin’ Juniper! The colt! It’s being sucked down in a whirlpool. I can’t see it now. My soul and body! A boy’s jumped off the scow.  He’s swimming out to help the colt.”

                The onlookers did not need the fisherman with the binoculars anymore. They could see for themselves. A boy swimming against the current. A boy holding a colt’s head above the swirling water. …Grandpa’s voice was as strong as a tow rope. Paul was swimming steadily toward it, holding the small silver face of the colt above the water. He was almost there. He was there!

… The air was wild with whinnies and snorts as the ponies touched the hard sand, then scrambled up the shore, their wet bodies gleaming in the sun. Paul half-carried the little colt up the steep bank; then suddenly it found its own legs.

                Shouts between triumph and relief escaped every throat as the little filly tottered up the bank. Almost to the top her feet went scooting out from under her and she was down on the sand, her sides heaving.

Maureen felt a new stab of fear.

If only the big ponies would not crush her! That tender white body among all those thrashing hooves. What chance had she? What chance with the wild wind for a mother?

But all the wildness seemed to have ebbed out of the Phantom. She picked her forefeet high. The she carefully straddled her colt, and fenced in the small white body with her own slender legs.

                                                                -from Misty of Chincoteague by Marguerite Henry

 

AND

“It’s the wind from the moor,” said Mary. “It’s the springtime and the out-of-doors and the sunshine.”
“Oh, Colin,” she said. “I have something to tell you.”
“What is it?” Colin held his breath.
“Dickon will come to see you tomorrow morning if you like, and he’ll bring his creatures with him-the  animals that he’s made tame and that are his friends.”
“Oh!” Colin cried out in delight.
“But that’s not all,” Mary went on. “The rest is better. There is a door into the garden. I found it.”
“Oh, Mary!” Colin said with a half sob. “Shall I see it? Shall I live to get into it?”
“Of course you’ll see it!” snapped Mary indignantly. “Of course you’ll live to get into it! Don’t be silly!”
And she was so unhysterical and natural that he came to his senses and began to laugh at himself. A few minutes afterward she was telling him not what she imagined the secret garden to be like but what it really was, and Colin’s aches and tiredness were forgotten, and he was listening, enraptured.
Later that morning Colin told his doctor, “I’m going out in my chair in a day or two if it is fine. I want some fresh air.”
“I thought you did not like fresh air,” said the doctor.
“I don’t when I’m by  myself,” replied Colin, “but my cousin is going out with me.”
“And the nurse, of course?” suggested the doctor.
“No, I will not have the nurse. A boy I know will push my carriage.”
The doctor looked rather alarmed. “He must be a strong boy and a steady boy, “ he said. “And I must know something about him. Who is he? What is his name?”
“It’s Dickon,” Mary spoke up suddenly.
“Oh, Dickon,” said the doctor. “If it is Dickon, you will be safe enough. He’s as strong as a moor pony, is Dickon.”
And so it was settled that Colin would, in a few days’ time, leave his dark, musty room and go out-of-doors.”
                From The Secret Garden by Frances Hodgson Burnett


FYI:                                      Book Report

Title: The Secret Garden
Author: Frances Hodgson Burnett
Publisher: J.B. Lippincott Company
Date: 1962
Characters: Mary Lennox, Colin Craven and Archibald Craven
    This book told about how Mary Lennox went to Misslthwaite Manor and how she lived there.

    Mary Lennox was born in India. Her mother never cared for her much because she was so homely and Mary was just spoiled by servants who obeyed all her commands.
    One morning., when Mary woke up she saw a different servant than the one that usually attended her. She asked where her usual servant was but what Mary didnot know was that her servant had died from a deadly disease which had striken her village.Finally all of Mary's family was wiped out, all except for Mary.
    She was sent to Yorkshire, England to live with her uncle, Archibald Craven. He lived in a big one hundred room house on the moor.The moor was a wide, wide land covered with wild things. The house was big and lonely and most of the inhabitants were't exactly pleasant. But one thing about the house was pleasant, outside there were many gardens and she had heard of a garden that her uncle had locked up when his wife died because she liked it so much. Everyday she hunted for the hidden garden but she couldn't find where its door was. A friendly robin showed her the door and the key, as if he knew for what she hunted. Mary kept the garden her secret, a place she could make alive.
     Several times during the night she heard crying and several times she asked her servant about it but no one would tell her. One night she heard crying. Mary wandered out into a long hall and into a room where she saw a pale sickly-looking boy, crying. He was Colin Archibald Craven who spent all his time indoors away from people because they always stared at him when he did go out. Mary told Colin about the secret garden as it really was but she pretended to imagine it. She didn't want Colin to know she had opened it for fear he might tell someone and she wanted to keep it a secret. Finally, when she told him he wanted to go out in it and that he did. Here, Colin learned to use his legs and that he really wasn't a hunchback. When Archibald Craven came back from his vacation he found his son could walk and run like other boys, never did he neglect him like he used to.
    I liked this book because it gave such a pretty picture of the secret garden.
Susan C.
Grade 6
Bartlett School
Cover A                  Content A-            Writing A


""""""
WHAT’S OUT THERE FOR  domesticated PONIES

Dartmoor Pony

A small indigenous pony found in a semi-wild state in the district of that name in the extreme south-west of England. One of the nine mountain and moorland or native breeds of the British Isles (which includes the Connemara), the Dartmoor provides a riding pony of 12 h.h., of great hardiness, some elegance and much charm. Many show hunters, hacks and ponies of the highest class have been bred up from Dartmoor ponies. Breed Society: The Dartmoor Pony Society.

-R.S. Summerhays
 
"" "" "" ""

Pinto pony, 5 y.o. , 11 hands, red and white, beautiful, been ridden English, good on trails, not spooky at shows, good for Farrier.

AND

Two year old Hafflinger stallion, very good boy, train your way, geld him, he  will make a great pony.

AND

The British Show Pony

In my opinion, breeders of…show ponies have arrived at a difficult period in their craft. The Arab stallion has been used with tremendous success, especially with Welsh ponies and those from the New Forest, and various of those heroes of the show ring since the War, claim descent from a particularly successful Arab stallion from Eire. When embarking on cross-breeding, infinite care must be taken. Any defects in the sire can be reproduced in the same or greater degree as his qualities. Too much use of Arab blood may tend to breed a pony lacking in wither, having straight forelegs and questionable hocks. Too much Thoroughbred blood may breed a pony light of bone, ‘up in the air,’ and with a horse’s head or hot temperament. In the end a bit of common blood that they possessed originally must be maintained in order to retain essential pony characteristics.
Another difficulty when breeding a top class pony for the show ring is to produce a combination of courage and personality with manners, for manners are absolutely in a child’s pony and no one, qualified to judge these classes, stands one at the top of the class if he considers it is not a suitable ride for a child of his age laid down in the catalogue or programme.  “
from The British Show Pony- John Tilling

"" "" "" ""

CARE AND FEEDING OF THE VERY EXPERIENCED:

   One day during this summer, the groom cleaned and dressed me with such extraordinary care, that I thought some new change must be at hand; he trimmed my fetlocks and legs, passed the tarbrush over my hoofs, and even parted my forelock. I think the harness had an extra polish. Willie seemed half-anxious, half-merry, as he got into the chaise with his grandfather.
“If the ladies take to him,” said the old gentleman, “they’ll be suited, and he’ll be suited; we can but try.”
    At the distance of a mile or two from the village, we came to a pretty, low house with a lawn and shrubbery at the front, and a drive up to the door. Willie rang the bell, and asked if Miss Blomefield or Miss Ellen was at home. Yes, they were. So, whilst Willie stayed with me, Mr. Thoroughgood went into the house.
    In about ten minutes he returned, followed by three ladies, one tall, pale lady, wrapped in a white shawl, leaned on a younger, with dark eyes and merry face; the other, a very stately-looking person, was Miss Blomefield. They all came and looked at me and asked questions. The younger lady- that was Miss Ellen- took to me very much; she said she was sure she would like me, I had such a good face. The tall, pale lady said that she should always be nervous in riding a horse that had once been down, as I might come down again, and if I did, she should never get over the fright.
    “You see, ladies,” said Mr. Thoroughgood, “many first-rate horses have had their knees broken, through the carelessness of their drivers, without any fault of their own, and from what I see of this horse, I should say that is his case; but of course I do not wish to influence you. If you incline, you can have him on trial, and then your coachman will see what he thinks of him.”
    “You have always been such a good adviser to us about our horses, “ said the stately lady, “that your recommendation would go a long way with me, and if my sister Lavinia sees no objection, we will accept your offer of a trial, with thanks.”
    It was then arranged that I should be sent for the next day.
    In the morning a smart-looking young man came for me; at first, he looked please; but when he saw my knees, he said in a disappointed voice:
    “: I didn’t think, sir, that you would have recommended my ladies a blemished horse like that.”
“Handsome is-that handsome does’,” said my master; “you are only taking him on trial, and I am sure you will do fairly by him, young man, and if he is not safe as any horse you ever drove, send him back.”
    I was led home, placed in a comfortable stable, fed and left to myself. The next day, when my groom was cleaning my face, he said:
    “That is just like the star that Black Beauty had, he is much the same height too, I wonder where he is now.”
    A little farther on, he came to the place in my neck where I was bled, and where a little knot was left in my skin. He almost started, and began to look me over carefully, talking to himself.
    “White star in the forehead, one white foot on the off-side, this little knot just in that place:”then looking at the middle of my back- “and as I am alive, there is that little patch of white hair that John used to call “Beauty’s threepenny bit’-. It must be Black Beauty! Why, Beauty! Beauty! Do you now me? Little Joe Green, that almost killed yo?” And he began patting and patting me as if he was quite overjoyed.
    I could not say that I remembered him, for now he was a fine grown young fellow, with black whiskers and a man’s voice, but I was sure he knew me, and that he was Joe Green, and I was very glad. I pout my nose up to him, and tried to say that we were friends. I never saw a man so pleased.
    “Give you a fair trial! I should think so indeed! I wonder who the rascal was that broke your knees, my old Beauty! You must have been badly served out somewhere; well, well, it won’t be my fault if you haven’t good times of it now. I wish John Manly was here to see you.”
    In the afternoon I was out into a low Park chair and brought to the door. Miss Ellen was going to try me, and Green went with her. I soon found that she was good driver, and she seemed pleased with my paces. I heard Joe telling her about me, and that he was sure I was     when we returned, the other sisters came out to hear how I had behaved myself. She told them just what she had heard, and said:
    “I shall certainly write to Mrs. Gordon, and tell her that her favourite horse has come to us. How pleased she will be!”
    After this I was driven every day for a week or so, and as I appeared to be quite safe, Miss Lavinia as last ventured out in the small close carriage. After this it was quite decided to keep me and call me by my old name “Black Beauty”.
    I have now lived in tis happy place for a whole year. Joe is the best and kindest of grooms. My work is easy and pleasant, and I feel my strength and spirits all coming back again. Mr.Thoroughgood said to Joe the other day:
    In your place he will last till he is twenty years old- perhaps more.”
    Willie always speaks to me when he can, and treats me as his special friend. My ladies have promised that I shall never be sold, and so I have nothing to fear; and here my story ends. My troubles are over, and I am at home; and often before I am quite awake, I fancy I am still in the orchard at B***w**k, standing with my old friends under the apple trees.
My Last Home
From Black Beauty by Anna Sewall

"" "" "" ""

Your fifth reading for
our Home Study Course
"The Quality of Money:
Can Thirty  Dollars
be better quality than 2.25 million?"
Goddamn money. It always ends up making you blue as hell...After I had my breakfast, it was only around noon and I wasn’t meeting Sally till two o’clock, so I started taking this long walk. I couldn’t stop thinking about those two nuns. I kept thinking about that beat up old straw basket they went around collecting money with when they weren’t teaching school. I kept trying to picture my mother, or my aunt, or maybe Sally Hayes’s crazy mother, standing outside some department store and collecting money for poor people in a beat-up old straw basket. It was hard to picture. Not so much my mother, but those other two. My aunt’s pretty charitable-she does a lot of Red Cross work and all- but she’s very well-dressed and all, and when she does anything charitable she’s always very well-dressed and has lipstick on and all that crap. I couldn’t picture her doing anything for charity if she had to wear black clothes and no lipstick while she was doing it. And old Sally Hayes’s mother.  Jesus Christ. The only way she could go around with a basket collecting dough would be if everybody kissed her a** for her when she made a contribution. If they just dropped their dough in her basket, then walked away without saying anything to her, ignoring her and all, she’d quit in about an hour. She’d get bored. She’d hand in her basket and then go someplace swanky for lunch. That’s  what I liked about  those nuns. You could tell for one thing, that they never went anywhere swanky for lunch. It made me so damn sad when I thought about it, their never going anywhere swanky for lunch or anything. I knew it wasn’t too important, but it made me sad anyway.
-Holden Caulfield in
Catcher in the Rye
(Scroll down to catch up on your past lessons!)





+++
It is Up to Us, to make sure
freethehumblefarmer.com
does not have to become freethehumblefarm.com.
We will honor those organizations and Public Broadcasting stations that uphold the mission of freethehumblefarmer.com, to protect the public in public radio, to speak truth to power, while stirring the public conscience with our annual Pony award ....
L
ater.....

+++
Meanwhile A Getting
  Out the Vote Story with TEETH
 
"I don't recall of signing any paper at MPBN for 29 years and if I did I'd like to see it. My memory is bad, but seems as I would have remembered something like that. I don't recall as there was any papers for people to sign until I made the robocall [Get Out The Vote Calls] for the democrats."
Thanks, humble
+++
Aug. 23, 2007
To the editors at Current.Org
On your website you published a letter [below] from S**** C***, in which she chastised Maine Public Broadcasting Network for allegedly "firing" a volunteer host of one of our music programs. It appears that Maine Public Broadcasting is being used in the early stages of what may become one of the fiercest political campaigns in some time.
Essentially MPBN was, among a host of other sins, accused of having former Maine [U.S.] senator and secretary of defense, the Hon. William Cohen, working as a MPBN trustee behind the scenes with others to affect the upcoming campaign for the Senate between Sen. Susan Collins (R) and [challenger] Rep. Tom Allen (D) by firing our radio host.
As we say in the news business, "never let the facts get in the way of a good story." Just for the record:
1. A simple phone call to verify the facts would have revealed that the Ms. C***k, misidentified MPBN Trustee "Bill Cohen," who is not our former senator, secretary of defense and strategist for Sen. Collins. The other Mr. Cohen lives in Bucksport, Maine. I wish she had called to check her facts.
2. The decision to cease airing The Humble Farmer came solely from Charles Beck, MPBN’s vice president of radio services, with absolutely no involvement from our Board of Trustees.
3. On numerous occasions, host Robert Skoglund had been strongly cautioned regarding the inclusion of extremely biased political commentary in [his] jazz program. In effect, what was originally a program devoted to music and humor suddenly became an opportunity for regular political commentary with occasional self-promotion. Mr. Skoglund had previously agreed in writing to comply with MPBN’s policies for on-air personalities and then later simply refused. Mr. Beck made the call on his own, and later was fully supported by the organization.
4. As for donations to political parties, MPBN has never audited any trustee or employee and certainly will not begin to engage in such unethical practices now. I was a trustee and trustee emeritus and I never had any political discussion with any board member other than one who ran against Sen. Cohen in the Senate race some years ago.
It is indeed unfortunate that MPBN has been included in early and aggressive pre-election campaign strategies. The inaccuracies of the accusations in S**** C****’s letter point to the need for the independent journalistic traditions of public broadcasting, which MPBN is proud to continue to uphold.
David E. Morse
Vice President for Marketing, Communication and Government Affairs, Maine Public Broadcasting Network
+++
Please Don't forget to VISIT   the archive on humble's firing at  www.current.org

To:  The Editor

Steve Behrens  Current.org

I encourage Mr. Morse (Vice President for Marketing, Communication and Government Affairs, Maine Public Broadcasting Network)to review carefully each of the 2 letters (reprinted at freethehumblefarmer.com on the River is Wide page) I sent to James Dowe, Chief Executive Officer of MPBN, in April 2007. Next, I ask that he find the place where I refer to Mr. Cohen as anyone other than William Cohen or Mr. Cohen. I am not sure which of Shakespeare's plays Mr. Morse is reading these days, but a quote from one of them comes to mind.

"The lady protests too much, methinks."--From Hamlet /(III, ii, 239)

Sincerely,

Susan Cook


+++
The fourth lesson in The Quality of Money Home study course
"I now have $50 million,
but I was just as happy when I had $48 million."
-Arnold Schwarzeneger
+++
The Third Reading Assignment for
 Our "Quality of Money: How 30 Dollars Can Better than 2.25 million" Home Study Course


BOB DYLAN'S
MUSICAL LESSON

........
"I pity the poor immigrant
whose strength is spent in vain,
Whose heaven is like Ironsides,
Whose tears are like rain,
Who eats but is not satisfied,
Who hears but does not see,
Who falls in love with wealth itself
And turns his back on me..."
(copyright 1966 Bob Dylan)
+++
Your Second Reading Assignment for our Home Study Course,

"The Quality of Money:
How 30 dollars can be better quality
than 2.25 million"

"Ukrainian Directors at work on Holodomor films"


by Elisabeth Sewall, Editor
Kyiv Post
Feb 21 2008, 02:26


“Some time later this year or next, certain films will appear, made by mavericks driven by a compulsion to tell the story of the genocide in Ukraine,” Borisow said…. “These films will have been made at great personal sacrifice by people who are not billionaires, just believers in Ukraine and the blood of ten million innocents who died for simply being. At least these few will have done the very best they can to stir the collective conscience.”

Two film projects are under production to throw spotlight on the Soviet-imposed famine-genocide of 1932-33 that killed millions of Ukrainians.
© Joseph Sywenkiy

Sergey Bukovsky is directing a new documentary on the 1932-1933 Holodomor genocide, Lystopad 7 (November 7). Bukovsky also directed Spell Your Name, a documentary about the Holocaust in Ukraine.

As Ukraine observes the 75-year commemoration of the Holodomor this year, two film projects are under production to throw spotlight on the Soviet-imposed famine-genocide of 1932-33 that killed millions of Ukrainians.

Their contributions would significantly boost the available films depicting the catastrophe, so far documented in two most notable works: the Canadian-produced “Harvest of Despair” in 1984 and the Ukrainian-made “Famine 33” in 1990.

So few films have been made because the Soviet government denied the Holodomor for more than half a century, while the years of Ukrainian independence were spent recovering history and recognizing the tragedy, which many still deny.

Since Ukraine’s independence, “there have been many films made, but not many quality films,” said Oles Sanin, director of one of the new film projects.

This is mostly due to financial difficulties, he said.

Sanin, among Ukraine’s most acclaimed contemporary film makers, is directing a feature film, “Kobzar,” which won’t be released until 2009.

For Sanin, it was important to make a feature film because they get more attention than documentaries.

The symbolism of this year isn’t that important for completing his work, he said.

“My one goal is to have the world see it and learn more about Holodomor,” Sanin said.

“Kobzar” is the fictional story of an American boy who gets stranded in Ukraine in the early 1930s and ends up as a guide for a blind kobzar, one of the  traveling bards who played the bandura, a traditional Ukrainian instrument. He survives after witnessing NKVD executions in 1934.

“The story unfolds against the backdrop of the Holodomor, but it is a story of how a young boy survived in the most tragic and dire circumstances,” said Peter Borisow, one of the film’s backers and president of the Hollywood Trident Foundation, an organization founded in 2001 that connects professionals working in the entertainment industry interested in Ukrainian affairs.

This January, Sanin and Borisow went to Florida to collect eyewitness testimony from Holodomor survivors as research for their feature film. They may use the gathered testimony to produce a documentary.

Ukrainian­American actor Jack Palance was going to play the lead role in “Kobzar,” until his death last year, Borisow said.

“Kobzar” was conceived several years ago by Sanin, who has been working on the script with Hollywood screenwriters.

Sanin caught Hollywood’s eye as a cinematic storyteller with his 2002 film "Mamay" – the closest a Ukrainian language movie has ever come to being recognized by the Academy, said Borisow, who has been working in the Hollywood film industry since the 1970s.

“Kobzar” will be shot mostly in Ukraine, with a mixture of English and Ukrainian languages with subtitles.

They are aiming for a budget of about $18 million, Borisow said.

As films addressing tragic topics are rarely blockbuster hits for Hollywood, financiers are few, he said.

The very first films depicting the Holocaust were “made possible by the unflinching financial support of the Jewish community worldwide,” Borisow said.

“They understood that telling their story was more important than adding yet another million to some billionaire’s already bloated fortune,” he said.

The wealthiest members of Ukrainian society, what he called “the growing billionaire’s club,” should “absolutely take on the initial financial burden if any meaningful films are to be made by Ukrainians about the Holodomor,” Borisow said, suspecting they fear a negative reaction from Russian business partners.

The second film to be made on the topic is a documentary being directed by Sergey Bukovsky, who gained international recognition after creating “Spell Your Name,” a documentary that featured eyewitness accounts of the Holocaust in Ukraine.

“Spell Your Name” was financed by Ukrainian billionaire Victor Pinchuk and American movie legend Steven Spielberg.

Bukovsky’s latest documentary, “Lystopad 7” (November 7), is reportedly being funded by the Ukraine 3000 International Charity Fund, founded in 2001 by Kateryna Yushchenko, the wife of President Viktor Yushchenko.

The fund plays a significant role in efforts to recognize the Holodomor, both domestically and abroad, as an act of genocide against Ukrainians.

Ukraine 3000 representatives were unavailable for comment on the film.

Though the Ukrainian government is financing numerous projects for the 75­year commemoration, including construction of a Holodomor Historical­Memorial Complex, a film is not among its plans.

Part of the problem is that many Ukrainians themselves deny the Holodomor was genocide against Ukrainians. The Party of the Regions and Communist Party of Ukraine, both supported by millions of Ukrainians, voted against recognizing the Holodomor as genocide in parliament.

Meanwhile, the Jewish people thrived in tolerant, Western societies, where they developed an extensive record of the Holocaust and financed its memory through museums, libraries, and films in particular.

Since 2000 in fact, more than 40 documentaries and 20 feature films depicting the Jewish Holocaust were produced worldwide; several hundreds were produced since World War II.

Shedding light on the Holodomor has been gaining pace through efforts by Ukraine’s president Viktor Yushchenko, who has urged the international community to recognize the catastrophe as genocide.

This year was designated to honor Holodomor victims and their memory, and a nationwide campaign to collect eyewitness accounts and survivor testimonies will continue throughout the year.

While in Soviet times Holodomor was a taboo topic, today more than 60 percent of Ukrainians think the United Nations should recognize the Holodomor as an act of genocide against the Ukrainian people, according to a poll conducted by the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology (KMIS), at the beginning of November 2007.

“Some time later this year or next, certain films will appear, made by mavericks driven by a compulsion to tell the story of the genocide in Ukraine,” Borisow said.

“These films will have been made at great personal sacrifice by people who are not billionaires, just believers in Ukraine and the blood of ten million innocents who died for simply being. At least these few will have done the very best they can to stir the collective conscience

+++


                     The First Lesson in our Home Study Course:
              Is My Thirty Dollars Better Quality than Your 2.25 Million?
The Simple Truth
I bought a dollar and a half’s worth of small red potatoes,
took them home, boiled them in their jackets
and ate them for dinner with a little butter and salt.
Then I walked through the dried fields
on the edge of town. In middle June the light
hung on in the dark furrows of my feet,
and in the mountain oaks overhead the birds
were gathering for the night, the jays and mockers
squawking back and forth, the finches still darting
into the dusty light. The woman who sold me
the potatoes was from Poland; she was someone
out of my childhood in a pink spangled sweater and sunglasses
praising the perfection of all her fruits and vegetables
at the road-side stand and urging me to taste
even the pale, raw sweet corn trucked all  the way,
she swore, from New Jersey. “Eat, eat,” she said,
“Even if you don’t I’ll say you did.”
                                                Some things
you know all your life. They are so simple and true
they must be said without elegance, meter and rhyme,
they must be laid on the table beside the salt shaker,
the glass of water, the absence of light gathering
in the shadows of picture frames, they must be
naked and alone, they must stand for themselves.
my friend Henri and I arrived at this together in 1965
before I went away and he began to kill himself,
and the two of us to betray our love. Can you taste
what I’m saying? It is onions or potatoes, a pinch
of simple salt, the wealth of melting butter, it is obvious,
it stays in the back of your throat like a truth
you never uttered because the time was always wrong,
it stays there for the rest of your life, unspoken,
made of that dirt we call earth, the metal we call salt,
in a form we have no words for, and you live on it.

By (copyright) Philip Levine
from The Simple Truth, Alfred A. Knopf, 1994


+++

Freethehumblefarmer.com offers here humble's exact words and those exactly of the MPBN management that fired him

*for a rant that began "I don't care for war..." and mentioned Hitler's autobiography,
*for volunteering to make "Get Out The Vote Calls" to unenrolled and enrolled voters in 2006, 
*for refusing to sign MPBN On-Air Guidelines,
that banned him from mentioning "political" or "controversial" topics.

Banning someone from saying the words Hitler on-air because it might remind someone of the atrocities of the past  is censorship.
Firing someone for making calls urging voters to go out and vote (not how to vote)
insults our Democracy.
The MPBN On-Air Guidelines, we believe, violate freedom of speech.
'humble', courageously,  sent the Guidelines back, unsigned, and,  on June 12, 2007, was fired, ending his 30 year radio show.

 See our "'humble is FIRED" section,
to read those Guidelines and more of this sad, undignified story.


This website tells the story of the cancellation of humble's radio show and why we believe his firing is an act of censorship by a Maine-taxpayer, publicly funded radio station that now has a Board of Trustees dominated by members who have given over $160,000 to the Republican party. MPBN receives, from the Maine General Fund, 2.25 million dollars a year.

Remember the thousands of dollars Maine Public Broadcasting threw away
from viewers who said
"We will not re-new our membership until 'The humble Farmer' is back on air."

If  the 30 or 50 or 100 dollar pledges that disappointed listeners held back to protest
'humble's firing' is not "good enough" for MPBN to care about,
then MPBN is not "good enough" for our hard-earned 2.25 million Maine taxpayer dollars.

In Our "Citizens Rant!" Section,
(look up at the left-hand side of the screen)
read comments from hundreds of listeners who protest humble's firing and censorship and told MPBN they will not renew their membership  until 'humble' is returned.


This budget year, the State of Maine is facing a 37 million dollar shortfall.
We are deeply troubled by the State of Maine giving 2.25 million dollars this  year
 to a public radio station
that practices censorship and denies freedom of speech, and threw away thousands of dollars from members who would not renew until 'humble' was back.
Mental health services, education, environmental protection and many other services to year-round Maine residents will be reduced or suspended this year.
Why should Maine public radio be fully funded, like our an entitled cultural goddess, that gets her money no matter how much she ignores Maine citizens and throws away their 30 or 40 or 100 dollar MPBN memberships?


We ask that you think a little bit about how this act of censorship on the part of Maine Public Radio hurts our democracy
(and read the whole story in our 'humble is FIRED' section.)

HOW TO GET CENSORED WITHOUT USING THE WORD HITLER: WHAT hUMBLE ACTUALLY READ ON-AIR ON FEBRUARY 28, 2003

Big-time rant coming up right now on war.

How do you feel about war? I probably shouldn't take sides, being privileged as I am to sit --- with your permission --- behind this microphone, but I am going to come right out and admit that I don't care for war. No, it's not the war itself that bothers me. It's the needless killing and starvation and destruction and expense part of war that bothers me.

You might argue with me and say that war is the only way we can control the world's population. You might tell me that birth control is not a good thing but there is nothing wrong with millions of young men dying gloriously on the field of battle defending their country. You might tell me that we've got to have wars because if the population continues to increase at the present rate, in 500 years there won't be standing room on this planet. And I've got to admit that you've got me --- I can't say a word about that.

Let's admit it. You and I know that there are people who do like war. Many of them are the simple flag waving folks who will stand right up in public to show their support for a wimpy looking, weasely faced war monger from way down south who didn't even get most of the popular vote. There. I've said it and I'm glad. But this is public radio so you shouldn't be surprised to learn where I stand. And besides the support from flag wavers, you know that when there's a war every big company stands to make money. So you'll find the unions standing right beside management when you're talking big time war.

It's pretty hard to stop a war when the man --- who calls himself the leader --- wants a war. You'll notice that he starts out by sword rattling --- lets all the other world leaders know that he's got to make a move very soon to protect the safety and well-being of his people --- no matter how far away it is. And if he says the same thing over and over and over there will be a few people out there who say to themselves, "Baaaa. You know, I think he's right. There are some bad guys out there who are killing our people. We've got more planes and tanks and guns and technology than anyone else, so why should we have to put up with it. Our leader says we'll hit them so hard and so fast it will be over before they knew what hit them. And before we are done, we will have restored order and sucked all the natural resources out of an unstable region."

All this while, even though the war-mongering, rat faced wimp knows what he's going to do no matter what, he's making a big public show of talking with the top guys in Russia and France and England --- trying to either get their support or keep them off his back while he blows half the world to kingdom come.

Agh. I've said enough about him. Every time I see him blabbing on TV I wonder how anyone could possibly have been stupid enough to vote for such an idiot. I comfort myself by knowing that most of the people who went to the polls didn't.

I'll bet you don't know that wimpy little weasel face wrote a book in which he very clearly outlines his plans. And it might surprise you to hear me say that if you haven't read it, you should. Got your pencil? The name of it is Mein Kampf.

+++++++++++++++++++++++

What did Maine Public Radio say to him?

Humble,

per my earlier email, I do not want us/you taking positions on controversial topics on air, it damages the objectivity and integrity of this service- we strive for fair, balanced and objective reporting and a neutral stance on controversial issues such as Iraq.

With the situation today, and the wording for your script, most people would absolutely think you were talking about the current US administration. I certainly did. Perception is reality.

We do not want any of these letters your received in response read on the air in your program, nor should you address this issue or any other issue in this fashion again. Again, if in doubt, please give me a call.

Now, I've also received a call at home from a reporter who says he has a copy of the earlier email I just sent to you?!? we need to talk Monday, please call me or send me your number. thanks.

Charles L. Beck, Vice President for Radio Services, Maine Public Broadcasting.

And then what was said to him?

2005

To The humble Farmer:

I do need to address another issue with you, again. I am disappointed

to have to do this again. You're a very smart guy; I'm not sure why we

continue to have this issue come up again....

I'm referring to your remarks about Hitler history and watching the

current evening news and thinking it's history repeating itself. In

the last two programs. As you well know, this can be interpreted by our

audience as being political commentary; and reflecting how you view

things. This in turn reflects on MPBN; as the

sponser/purveyor/broadcaster of your program. We prize ourselves for

being objective and balanced and not leaning left or right or forward or

backward or anyway. We do not want nor allow our local music programs

[notice that local music program is specified to permit airing of the

politically charged Prairie Home Companion]

to present any sort of polical commentary, and would appreciate it if

you would also follow this guideline.

Please make a note of this and lets make sure we don't have to deal with

this again.... Thanks humble, for your help with this.

Call me if you have any questions.

Charles L. Beck, Vice President for Radio Services

Maine Public Broadcasting Network

65 Texas Avenue Bangor, Maine 04401

800 884-1717 x3086 207 941-1010 X3086 207 942 2857 fax

cbeck@mpbn.net

++

And then what did humble say?

HOW TO GET BANNED BY SAYING THE WORD MUSSOLINI: WHAT THE hUMBLE FARMER ACTUALLY READ ON-AIR ON AUGUST 25, 2006

Postscript: "I am now sorry that I read it and want to apologize to all of the Fascists in my listening audience who were offended when they heard it."

- The humble "mea culpa" Farmer

 

While reading in my Encyclopedia Britannica about Salvatore Quasimodo, who was awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1959, I also learned that Fascism is a radical totalitarian political philosophy that combines elements of corporatism, extreme nationalism, anti-liberalism, militarism and authoritarianism. Unfortunately, Fascism is much like streptococcus bacilli: most of us don’t even know it when we see it and even specialists in the field might quibble over a comprehensive definition.

Because I have recently not only been forced to take off my shoes before boarding a plane but have been patted down to strip me of my toothpaste and bag balm --- arguably meaningless symbolic gestures implemented to acclimate a population to mindless obedience --- I read further, hoping to learn to identify Fascism and thereby determine if it could be gaining a foothold in this land of the free and the home of the brave. This is what I read.

Around 1921 an Italian Prime Minister named Giolitti permitted the usual government influence on elections by corruption. This gave Mussolini and his fledgling fascists a slight edge and they immediately attacked Giolitti for his support of the League of Nations (a world government organization) and for his belief in the methods of parliamentary democracy. Gradually building up a nationwide party organization containing extreme undesirables, the fascists nearly always had more money than their opponents and moved with greater ruthlessness, although, at every step, Mussolini claimed to be the defender of law and order.

The industrialists were naturally in sympathy with a movement that stood for lower wages and fat, padded contracts. Although the economy had improved it was to their advantage to create the impression that without Fascism, economic breakdown was right around the corner, caused by Socialist incompetence.

The uneducated were naturally receptive to Fascist propaganda and disorderly elements on every level of society welcomed the violence and its attendant opportunity to plunder. Even then, it was not the strength of the Fascists that assured their success but the disorganization and silence of their opponents in the intellectual community. Italians discovered only much later that handing over power to people who claimed to be protecting their country with murder and openly proclaimed their contempt of parliamentary institutions would cost their country dear.

For years there was no overt establishment of dictatorship. Only gradually were old ways and old institutions changed and nothing was done abruptly that might alarm people or make them realize that a revolution had taken place. The wealthy were courted by cutting their taxes. For permission to become rich and corrupt the gerarchi supported their leader’s irresponsible decisions. The inefficiency and graft of his department heads were accepted as inevitable.

When an Italian was killed by bandits in the Balkans, Mussolini and other indignant, patriotic profit-seeking Italians had their long-hoped-for excuse to go to war. To his credit, until they strung him up by the heels, Mussolini’s self confidence never waned and he continued to have a pathetic trust in his own powers of intuition, even after plunging his country into that disastrous war for which he was obviously so unprepared.

As you know, the Encyclopedia Britannica is a fat volume, there is much more in there about the rise of Fascism in Italy, but a continuation and refining of my studies would be no more than an unproductive, academic exercise. Because --- in reading the few paragraphs above, you can see that my premise was shaky: Nothing that I have copied there could suggest a parallel between the rise of fascism in Italy in the 1920s and what is happening in our country today.

You may sleep well tonight. It simply couldn’t happen here.

And then what happened?

A little known fact:

In November 2006, Robert Skoglund, The humble Farmer, like many other media personalities made automatic "robo" calls to voters that said something like this:

"Hi there, It's your buddy humble here urging you to go out and vote on Tuesday." He was told by Maine Public Radio, after that, to say nothing about anything but music. Some time later he was fired. By the way, he was asked to make that recording -sent to all sorts of Mainers (including those not registered with any political party at all)- by a prominent democrat (can't remember if it is a big Dor little d).

That's about his and our right to take part in a democracy.

That's about our civil liberties.

That's why freethehumblefarmer.com came to be.

++



HOW TO GET CENSORED WITHOUT USING THE WORD HITLER: WHAT hUMBLE ACTUALLY READ ON-AIR ON FEBRUARY 28, 2003

Big-time rant coming up right now on war.

How do you feel about war? I probably shouldn't take sides, being privileged as I am to sit --- with your permission --- behind this microphone, but I am going to come right out and admit that I don't care for war. No, it's not the war itself that bothers me. It's the needless killing and starvation and destruction and expense part of war that bothers me.

You might argue with me and say that war is the only way we can control the world's population. You might tell me that birth control is not a good thing but there is nothing wrong with millions of young men dying gloriously on the field of battle defending their country. You might tell me that we've got to have wars because if the population continues to increase at the present rate, in 500 years there won't be standing room on this planet. And I've got to admit that you've got me --- I can't say a word about that.

Let's admit it. You and I know that there are people who do like war. Many of them are the simple flag waving folks who will stand right up in public to show their support for a wimpy looking, weasely faced war monger from way down south who didn't even get most of the popular vote. There. I've said it and I'm glad. But this is public radio so you shouldn't be surprised to learn where I stand. And besides the support from flag wavers, you know that when there's a war every big company stands to make money. So you'll find the unions standing right beside management when you're talking big time war.

It's pretty hard to stop a war when the man --- who calls himself the leader --- wants a war. You'll notice that he starts out by sword rattling --- lets all the other world leaders know that he's got to make a move very soon to protect the safety and well-being of his people --- no matter how far away it is. And if he says the same thing over and over and over there will be a few people out there who say to themselves, "Baaaa. You know, I think he's right. There are some bad guys out there who are killing our people. We've got more planes and tanks and guns and technology than anyone else, so why should we have to put up with it. Our leader says we'll hit them so hard and so fast it will be over before they knew what hit them. And before we are done, we will have restored order and sucked all the natural resources out of an unstable region."

All this while, even though the war-mongering, rat faced wimp knows what he's going to do no matter what, he's making a big public show of talking with the top guys in Russia and France and England --- trying to either get their support or keep them off his back while he blows half the world to kingdom come.

Agh. I've said enough about him. Every time I see him blabbing on TV I wonder how anyone could possibly have been stupid enough to vote for such an idiot. I comfort myself by knowing that most of the people who went to the polls didn't.

I'll bet you don't know that wimpy little weasel face wrote a book in which he very clearly outlines his plans. And it might surprise you to hear me say that if you haven't read it, you should. Got your pencil? The name of it is Mein Kampf.
 
 
 
Do you know that publicly-funded Maine Public Radio will still have to seek from Your Maine legislature this year?
  2.25 million dollars.

Guess what gets less money than that from the Maine General Fund?

PRESCHOOL HANDICAPPED 0449

PROGRAM SUMMARY

GENERAL FUND     2007-08     2008-09
POSITIONS - LEGISLATIVE COUNT
    1.000     1.000
Personal Services
    $86,834     $88,210


See what other Maine programs receive less than 2.25 million,
at www.maine.gov.
 
Do you know what programs in Maine have had their funds eliminated
OR don't receive 2.25 million a year, like MPBN does?


Through Health and Human Services,
Child Care Services 0563

Explanation? Initiative: Provides funding to support the inclusion of children with special needs in child care.

RECEIVED FROM THE GENERAL FUND  IN 2008-09
    $300,000     


WHAT ELSE RECEIVES LESS THAN MAINE PUBLIC BROADCASTING?

T
HE WILD BLUEBERRY COMMISSION,
 
  RECEIVED  $1,595,000  OUT OF THE GENERAL FUND,
IN 2007-2008,
ONE MILLION LESS THAN MAINE PUBLIC BROADCASTING.
 (CHECK OUT L.D. 490 UNDER  "LEGISLATURE" + "BILL TEXT" AT www.maine.gov, FOR YOURSELF).

NOT MUCH SUPPORT FOR ONE OF OUR MOST IMPORTANT AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS !


Then there's
DIRIGO HEALTH,
 MAINE'S NATIONALLY RECOGNIZED HEALTH CARE PROGRAM
COMES IN AT HALF WHAT MPBN RECEIVES , ABOUT 1.36 MILLION !
++++

Please vote against any state funding for the Maine Public Broadcasting Network
 It hurts to make such a request, but I must. This once-great broadcasting service has become a vehicle of censorship, having fired Robert Skoglund, The humble Farmer, for his refusal to sign a statement of conditions giving the management the right to control what he would say.
Until Mr. Dowe, Mr. Beck and the board of MPBN come to terms with the concept of free speech, MPBN does not deserve public funding support
(Empty BN Founded by Colby, Bates & Bowdoin Colleges & the Maine state college system.Losted by D__, B___ & the Bored.)
Thank you.

L*rz N*elson
E*st B*othb*y

++

Do We Really Believe the Public in Public Radio Is Not Protected
 here in Maine?


Do We Trust MPBN To Respect Listeners' Opinions?
Read On...

So, months later, on October 3, 2007:

Hundreds and hundreds of letters later, this is how they respond to a twenty year member.
October 3, 2007
From: Charles Beck, Vice President for Radio Services, Maine Public  Broadcasting Network, Bangor, Maine

To: Micha*l.Conn*e*ly*@verizon.net
Cc: "David Morse" <dmorse@mpbn.net>, Vice President for Marketing, Communication and Government Affairs, Maine Public Broadcasting Network, Bangor, Maine

Hi Michael.  I did check with membership and they confirmed that your
membership was indeed cancelled; the guide etc was "in the pipeline" - but
you should stop recieving any further material.   Please be patient.
Sorry you have made this choice.   MPBN public radio continually strives
to maintain the valued trust of it's diverse audience through impartiality
and non-partisanship.    As I'm sure you know, there are many alternatives
that choose to take a different course.
Sincerely,
Charles Beck


Written in response to this:
Charles Beck
Vice President for Radio Services
Maine Public Broadcasting Network
October 3, 2007
Hey Chuck,
   I don't know what's going on there, but the membership people seem to be asleep at the wheel-- I've sent several messages, email and snail, saying that we wanted to cancel our membership and have asked that they please stop sending the MPBN magazine, but the magazine keeps coming and they just sent another renewal notice.  Maybe you could walk over to their offices and, I don't know, maybe bash a gong a few times? Sound an air horn of the sort kept on boats to attract attention when sinking?
   We were sort of surprised not to see MPBN at the Common Ground Fair, but we had a very nice time listening to the humble Farmer.  There was a very, very good turnout this year, I think 18,000 and change on Friday, and even more on Saturday.  Altogether, more than 60,000 people came!  Many with deep pockets. Odd than MPBN couldn't make it...
    You know, there is a way to restore order. A way to make things right.  It's not that hard. MPBN could do it. You could make it happen. Support is what a public radio station wants, not tsuris.  Look it up if you don't know what it means.

Have a nice day.

Mike C*nn*lly
Brunswi**


 So, this is why FreeThehumbleFarmer@localnet.com carries on. Here, you can read the hundreds of letters in our Rant Control section protesting the censorship of the humble farmer. You can see the hundreds of Mainers' whose opinions Maine Public Radio threw out. You can see for yourself why many believe humble's firing is a fundamental  violation of the freedom of speech rights given to all of us in the Constitution. MPBN's arrogance has not let up for a minute. We feel betrayed  by a Maine Publicly-funded  radio station that says that it listens to the public but in fact ignores their letters.  Our state tax dollars support a radio station that threw away the Message from over 600 letters (still coming in),  a petition signed by over 60 Maine Legislators and 200 + Petition signers asking that no State of Maine tax dollars be given to a Public radio station that we believe denies freedom of speech. We do not believe that Public funds should be given to a Public radio station that disregards what humdreds in the listening  Public say. The Public has said it many times: "We want humble back on the radio waves".

Remember to send in your Rant for our Rant Control Section!
to:
freethehumblefarmer@localnet.com

AND WE'LL PUT THEM WITH OUR

CITIZENS' RANTS FOR HUMBLE
 In our Rant Control section!!!

AND
 
COULD  Mr. Woodcock HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH hUMBLE'S FIRING?
(The former right-wing Republican candidate for Maine Governor not the bird)
(Editor's note: Woodcock Feeding Patterns:
Probes deep in soil with long bill, which it can open below surface to grab prey. Can eat its weight in earthworms within 24 hours;
also eats insects, seeds)

GO TO OUR 'hUMBLE IS FIRED' SECTION AND FIND OUT!


AND AS ALWAYS
A
Rant for All Time

Life's Not the Way It Should Be, Anymore.
 
I only met Robert Karl Skogland once, at the Center Theater in Dover-Foxcroft, but I listened to him for over fifteen years on Maine Public radio. Every Friday night, for an hour, Mr. Skogland, The humble farmer, entertained me with really good mainstream jazz, which you don't hear too much of anymore, and, more importantly, his own brand of Downeast humor, which you don't hear any of, at least on the radio.Last night, he was gone. No, thank goodness, he didn't die, although there may be some that wish he did. He didn't move away, 'cause he loves this state too much to do so.  And he didn't run out of material, 'cause you can't make this stuff up; his friends told him  stories and he just told us.  
No, humble's unpardonable sin was to stand up for the right to say things over the radio that some might construe as political. In the end, Mr. Skogland wouldn't -- nay, couldn't -- sign a set of guidelines that included detailed descriptions of what is and isn't acceptable on-the-air banter.  It's another example of micro-management by bureaucrats who are either afraid for their overpaid jobs, or have been bought and paid for by contributions from politicians of the opposite ilk. When humble related the tale of TABOR-like legislation in another state, he was reprimanded for it.  When he rattled off some of the characteristics of history's most infamous madman, some thought he was talking about our current fearless leader (fearless when he though the mission was accomplished, of course. What did you do in the war, daddy?).  Well, I rarely contributed to MPBN anyway, even though I wanted to. I'm one of the unlucky ones who is a one hundred percent disabled veteran and has to check the 'under $15,000' category often found in nosy applications. But now, I wouldn't think of giving them a dime. Not that they care -- my $35 is made up a thousand-fold by some millionaire mucky-muck who likes the current administration, 'cause it's helping him get even richer.  The administration doesn't need to be criticized, or even ridiculed. It needs to be impeached and imprisoned for their crimes against the people who didn't elect them. One of those crimes is our loss of The humble Farmer.  Maine will never be the same.R*** M**** from Co****a
 

FreeThehumbleFarmer@localnet.com is an activist group dedicated to protecting the Public in Public Broadcasting,  freedom of speech and The humble Farmer, Robert Skoglund. Humble, as his friends call him, produced  a radio program on Friday nights at 7:00pm for 30 years on Maine Public Broadcasting Network. Featured were  humble's dry Maine humor, wry observations of  how the world works and his dazzling knowledge and appreciation of traditional jazz. He was fired  on June 12, 2007 by the Maine Public Broadcasting Network because he refused to sign  guidelines requiring that he make no statements about controversial or political topics, the exact kind of comments that brought thousands of listeners to humble, in the first place.  The National Coalition Against Censorship, hundreds of Maine citizens, and over 60 members of the Maine legislature (including Maine's Secretary of State) have asked MPBN to return The humble Farmer and Skoglund to the airwaves. Over 200 Maine citizens have signed a petition in June 2007 for suspension of State funding to Maine Public Broadcasting because of their failure to honor freedom of speech. This website tells the story of the a publicly funded radio station that says that talking about war is a partisan activity; that talking about tax cuts is a partisan actvity. And, by the way, a publicly funded radio station that has a Board of Trustees that has given over $160,000 to Republican candidates. (see letters below)  That's not partisan bias on their part? HUH? We believe it is a denial of free speech to one of  Maine's most original performers by a public broadcasting network. We update you on the ongoing legislative process to limit taxpayer dollars and Public funding for a Public broadcasting network- not a privately owned station -  that puts censorship ahead of freedom of speech.

This is the letter that The humble Farmer read on air, in October 2006,  from a viewer in Maryland that led Charles L. Beck, Vice President for Radio Services at Maine Public Broadcasting (or is it Betrayal?) to censor 'humble' and demand that 'humble' sign censorship guidelines.

"Rant # 8. Dear humble, We live near DC and "tax cut" never means better control of pork barrel spending or programs that benefit corporations at the expense of everyman. It always means that the cuts will be in social services, humanitarian efforts, environmental issues, and all those "useless" programs that generally benefit the poor and middle class and not the wealthy. A tax "ceiling" was implemented on spending in nearby Prince George's County. The result - PG County is now one of the worst counties in the nation in terms of student achievement, even though it has had had a huge influx of higher paid residents. The folks who can afford it, even the minority residents, are sending their kids to private schools. Teachers have to buy their own supplies, books arrive three weeks after school starts because the school system's expenditures are slow. Fiscal responsibility is one thing. Tax cuts designed to "red tape" needy programs to death while expediting tax cuts to the wealthy (described as "beneficial to the economy") are another."


What Drives Us are conflicts of interest between major political donors and their influence on Maine Public Radio, like the ones described below. Public broadcasting is about stirring the public conscience, not political party affiliation.


A Second Open Letter to the Maine Public Broadcasting Board of Trustees
[NOTE: THE DONATIONS LISTED BELOW DO NOT INCLUDE THE $100,000 THAT MPBN TRUSTEE MR.GLICKMAN GAVE TO THE REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE IN 2000.]

James Dowe, CEO
Maine Public Broadcasting Network
1450 Lisbon Street Lewiston, ME 04240
April 23, 2007  

Dear Mr. Dowe,
   Thank you very much for sending me a copy of the “Conflict of Interest” guidelines that Maine Public Broadcasting Trustees are given upon appointment to the MPBN Board.
   Because the censorship of the Humble Farmer, Robert Skoglund has been identified as stemming from his articulation of controversial political issues, it is important to illuminate some apparent conflicts of interest among your Board members.
Quoting from the document you kindly forwarded to me, the definition of conflict of interest is
i) a material transaction effected or proposed to be effected by the Corporation to which a trustee, officer or employee of the Corporation is a party or in which such person otherwise has a direct or indirect financial interest
ii) a relationship of or a circumstance involving a Trustee, officer or employee of the Corporation that would reasonably be expected to exert an influence on the judgment of the Trustee, officer or employee with respect to a material aspect of the business or affairs of the Corporation.
With that definition of conflict of interest in mind, according to the online Federal Election Commission Reports as of April 26, 2007, a better name for the Maine Public Broadcasting Network Board of Trustees might be “The Committee to Re-elect Senator Susan Collins” or during the last election cycle, Senator Olympia Snowe. Of your 22 Board members (I include you as a Board Member here),  11 members have given  approximately  $60,000 to either the campaigns of Olympia Snowe or Susan Collins.  This does not include Trustees who gave to a Political Action Committee, under the name of a corporation that they held partnership in or owned or whose individual contribution was given by a spouse and listed under the spouse’s name. Mr. Dowe, included in this list are your own contributions to Susan Collins’ campaign in 2002.

It is especially disturbing that between the MPBN Board Chair and Vice Chair,  $10,000 in campaign contributions have been made to these two candidates. I will also note the very disturbing fact that Mr. Cohen, less than 2 weeks before the April 12, 2007 meeting, gave a $1000 contribution to Susan Collins, as did Mr. Wishcamper’s company.  I heard no acknowledgement of those contributions as a conflict of interest during the April 12 meeting, even after I noted that Mr. Skoglund’s censorship began on the very evening that he attended a publicized non-Olympia Snowe candidate campaign event.

Because of the accusation that Mr. Skoglund threatens the “trust” that MPBN has created with the public over the years, I believe that your Board members who have given so generously to these two Republican candidates should recuse themselves from any involvement in decision making about Mr. Skoglund’s censorship. To do less is to engage in an overt and I think hypocritical, conflict of interest in handling this matter.
I would very much appreciate open acknowledgement of the conflict of interest that this extensive history of financial contribution to the campaigns of the two Republican Senators by the majority of your Board members creates. Thank you for your kind response to my letter. -a humble Farmer advocate

Still, take time to cheer yourself up.
Listen to The humble Farmer, Robert Skoglund
at www.wdna.org 
and
from his website:  www.humblefarmer.com
and Now on a public access cable television near you
and on other public radio stations that know that censorship is bad for democracies.
And see 'humble' live during his Maine summer tour!